Marstek 2,56kWh JUPITER-C PLUS Expansion Module

Article number: MSKJUPITERBAT
Marstek
JUPITER-C PLUS JUPITER-C PLUS JUPITER-C PLUS JUPITER-C PLUS JUPITER-C PLUS JUPITER-C PLUS JUPITER-C PLUS Marstek APP QR
JUPITER-C PLUS
JUPITER-C PLUS
JUPITER-C PLUS
JUPITER-C PLUS
JUPITER-C PLUS
JUPITER-C PLUS
JUPITER-C PLUS
Marstek APP QR
New Pre-Order Deal Hot Sales

This expansion module is specially designed for the Marstek Jupiter C+ home battery. With a capacity of 2.56kWh per module, you can flexibly scale your storage capacity as your energy needs grow. ....

Condition: New

795,00
per Pieces (incl. VAT)
This product is not in stock Expected delivery time: 6 week(s)
  • Low and competitive shipping costs.
  • Fast delivery
  • Easy Ordering & Wide Payment Options
  • Wide Payment Options
Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

To share

Description

Marstek Jupiter C+ – Expansion Module 2.56kWh

Easily expand your storage system up to 4 batteries
This expansion module is specially designed for the Marstek Jupiter C+ home battery. With a capacity of 2.56kWh per module, you can flexibly scale your storage capacity as your energy needs grow. Stack up to four batteries with simple plug-and-play installation — no technical expertise required.

Equipped with durable LiFePO4 cells, IP65-rated casing, and silent natural cooling, this battery module is built for reliable performance in all conditions.

Technical specifications

  • Model: JC+ B2500

  • Capacity: 2.56kWh

  • Life cycle: >6000 charge/discharge cycles (at 25°C)

  • Battery type: Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4)

  • Operating temperature: -20°C to +60°C

  • Storage temperature: -30°C to +85°C

  • Humidity range: 0–95%

  • IP rating: IP65

  • Cooling: Natural passive cooling

  • Max installation altitude: 2000 meters

Note: Compatible only with the Marstek Jupiter C+ system.

Reviews

No reviews yet

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0